Diagnostic Imaging Method

ABSTRACT

A method of identifying injury to soft connective tissues in complicated body joints deploys use of motion x-ray images as the joint moves to identify suspected abnormal pathology followed by Dynamic Upright MRI images of the joint under conditions that express the abnormal pathology. The Dynamic Upright MRI parameters are based on the suspected pathology. The method is particularly useful in detecting disco/ligamentous and other injuries that often times will not be visualized on conventional recumbent MRI, or static x-rays.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to the U.S. Provisional Patent Application of the same title having application Ser. No. 61/038,775 which was filed on Mar. 23, 2008 and is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to radiological imaging, and in particular to methods of MRI imaging of soft tissue.

The limitations of conventional X-ray imaging in detecting and diagnosing soft tissue injuries, that is structures other than calcified bone, is well known. Soft tissue, being much less dense than bone, has either too low a contrast to be observed, or is obscured by the bone structures, as the x-ray itself is a projected image in which x-rays are attenuated as they pass through the patient.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides images of tissues not generally visible in x-rays, as well as bone. Rather than the images being a projection through the tissue and organ from the front to the back of the image plane, as in conventional x-rays images, like Computed tomography (CT), MRI can be obtained of thin slices at different positions and orientations in any plane. Further, MR has much greater soft tissue contrast than CT making it especially useful in neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and oncological diseases. Unlike CT it uses no ionizing radiation. The scanner creates a powerful magnetic field which aligns the magnetization of hydrogen atoms in the body. Radio waves are used to alter the alignment of this magnetization. This causes the hydrogen atoms to emit a weak radio signal which is amplified by the scanner. This signal can be manipulated by additional magnetic fields to build up enough information to reconstruct an image of the body.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging while capable of imaging soft tissue, as currently practiced has numerous limitations in identifying soft tissue injuries. While improvements in MRI scanning techniques have reduced the acquisition time, imaging is still a serial technique where a slice of the patient is imaged by precise positioning of a magnetic field and the imposition of gradients onto the slice. Thus, MRI has the advantage over X-ray in that surrounding structure is eliminated, while X-ray are a projection, with denser tissue obscuring features in finer tissue. However, as one attempts to acquire a sequence of MRI images dynamically, with limited motion between them, the resolution is inherently reduced as the speed of acquisition is increased to acquire additional frames.

Unfortunately, a failure to find soft tissue injuries by MRI frequently leads to incorrect diagnosis, or the assumption that the patient is exaggerating about the symptoms of pain and discomfort, or are of a psychological rather than physical origin.

It is now appreciated, in light of the present invention, that because MRI is so specific and sensitive soft tissue injuries are more frequently missed than identified. The ability to know early on in a patient's injury on what exactly has been traumatized is likely to result in better clinical outcomes for patients, and less risk of further degeneration, progressive deterioration of a patient's condition from neglect or inappropriate treatments.

It is therefore a first object of the present invention to provide for the identification of soft tissue injuries that have been elusive to static conventional diagnostic imaging protocols.

It is a further object of the invention to avoid the waste of time and expense on unreasonable treatments and diagnostic studies that are made when soft tissue injury is overlooked or not fully understood.

It is a further object of the invention to provide for the assessment and evaluation of the soft tissue injuries in moving joints, and in particular injuries to the cervical spine. The proper assessment and evaluation directs the treating Physician into the best treatment/care plan necessary to help the injured patient, to minimize future pain and prevent treatments that can increase pain or cause further injury.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In the present invention, the first object is achieved by providing a medical imaging method for joints in living creatures, the method comprising the steps of: acquiring a dynamic sequence of x-ray images of at least one joint of a living creature over a range of motion, analyzing the dynamic x-ray image frames to identify positions and locations with possible abnormal pathology, determining MRI parameters for imaging the possible abnormal pathology in greater detail than the x-ray images, acquiring MRI images at positions and locations with abnormal pathology with said parameters.

The above and other objects, effects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the embodiments thereof taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a first embodiment of the method

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a second embodiment of the method

FIG. 3 is a sagittal neutral position MRI of the cervical spine of a healthy patient naming most of the visible anatomy.

FIG. 4A is an x-ray of the cervical spine of the upright patient in a neutral posture frame while FIG. 4B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 4A was acquired and FIG. 4C is the sagital MRI corresponding to the posture in FIG. 4A.

FIG. 5A is an x-ray frame of the cervical spine of the upright patient in a neutral posture frame while FIG. 5B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 5A was acquired. FIG. 5C is the sagital MRI corresponding to the posture in FIG. 5A

FIG. 6A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence capturing the cervical spine of the upright patient in a flexion posture while FIG. 6B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 6A was acquired and FIG. 6C is the sagital MRI corresponding to the posture in FIG. 6A

FIG. 7A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence capturing the cervical spine of the upright patient in a flexion posture while FIG. 7B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 7A was acquired. FIG. 7C is the sagital MRI corresponding to the posture in FIG. 7A

FIG. 8A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence capturing the cervical spine of the upright patient in a extension posture while FIG. 8B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 8A was acquired and FIG. 8C is the sagital MRI corresponding to the posture in FIG. 8A

FIG. 9A is an x-ray frame of the cervical spine of the upright patient in a neutral posture frame while FIG. 9B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 9A was acquired. FIG. 9C is an axial MRI image on the slice indicated on FIG. 6A

FIG. 10A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence of the cervical spine of patient is in an upright posture capturing the right rotation of the head, FIG. 10B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 10A was acquired. FIG. 10C is an axial MRI image on the slice indicated on FIG. 10A

FIG. 11A is an x-ray frame of the cervical spine of the upright patient in a neutral posture frame while FIG. 11B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 11A was acquired. FIG. 11C is an axial MRI image on the slice indicated on FIG. 11A

FIG. 12A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence capturing the cervical spine of the upright patient in a flexion posture while FIG. 12B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 12A was acquired. FIG. 12C is an axial MRI image on the slice indicated on FIG. 12A

FIG. 13A is a frame of a dynamic x-ray sequence capturing the cervical spine of the upright patient in an extension posture while FIG. 13B is a photograph of the patient at the time the frame in FIG. 13A was acquired. FIG. 13C is an axial MRI image on the slice indicated on FIG. 13A

FIG. 14 is a flow chart for a computer aided application of the process.

FIG. 15A is a plan section view to schematically illustrate an embodiment of an apparatus for carrying out the imaging process. FIG. 15B is a schematic illustration of a method of posture tracking for use with the inventive method.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIGS. 1 through 14, wherein like reference numerals refer to like components in the various views, there is illustrated therein a new and improved Diagnostic Imaging Method, generally denominated 100 herein.

In accordance with the present invention, the inventive process 100 as shown in FIG. 1 comprises a first step 110 of acquiring dynamic x-ray sequence of at least one joint of a living creature over a range of motion. In the first step, 110 x-ray images are continuously acquired in different views of the joint under investigation as the patient moves the joint in the different direction of normal motion. It is generally preferable the joint's are load bearing during all of the dynamic X-ray (step 110) and MRI imaging steps 140, however in some instances it may prove useful to obtain non-load bearing images by either static or dynamic x-ray or MRI.

The next step 120 in process 100 is analyzing the dynamic x-ray frames to identify positions and locations with abnormal pathoanatomy. The subsequent step 130 in process 100 is Determining of MRI parameters i.e. (which may include one or more of slice orientation, slice thickness, spin sequence and patient positioning, as further described below. The next step 140 is acquiring MRI images under these parameters at positions and locations with abnormal pathoanatomy with said parameters.

Various embodiments and results of the invention will now be illustrated with respect to the diagnosis of patients that have suffered a painful or other injury to the cervical spine, such as from a motor vehicle accident (MVA). In step 110, one or more series of x-rays images are acquired while the patient stands upright and move their head in the directions indicated by the technician, which generally include in addition to neutral sagital images, a sequence of images in front to back flexion, extension and side to side movement. Axial views are recorded during the front to back extension and flexion as well as anterior-posterior view is recorded during side to side motion. The x-rays are acquired very rapidly so that the patient can move the neck at normal speed but each x-ray image frame will show a relative small amount of motion with respect to the adjacent frames. As the patient is upright, the mass of the head places a load on the cervical spine.

Recent improvements in the digital acquisition of x-rays have enabled dynamic x-ray imaging where the clinician is able to see the bone structure in a joint as the patient moves, as well as capture a sequence of digital images of the joint under study in real time. Presently dynamic x-ray equipment is available from DMX Works, Inc., 4159-B Corporate Court Palm Harbor, Fla. 34683. Other means of digital x-ray image acquisition are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,256,374 and 6,490,475, which are incorporated herein by reference.

In step 120, the full sequence of x-ray image frames acquired in step 110 is then reviewed by a physician to identify which postures indicate the most aberrant pathoantomy for positive findings of intersegmental joint dysfunction/instability. By aberrant pathoanotomy we mean postures that show an abnormal absolute and relative position of the cervical vertebrae with respect to each other, causing dysfunction or instability of intersegmental joints.

Although these selected X-ray images do not reveal the soft tissue damage itself they serve as a guide for subsequent MRI imaging, which if carried out according to the most preferred embodiment of the invention, will reproducibly reveal the actual soft tissue damage.

The next step 130 of determining the MRI conditions is based on the patient specific biomechanic assessment of vertebra posture and anatomy of the surrounding soft tissue.

Soft tissue damage when detected by MRI is generally apparent either because the soft tissue is torn, thinned, scarred or misplaced/disconnected. However, it has been discovered that these changes will generally not be apparent unless the MRI is acquired under the conditions that indicated abnormal pathology in the motion x-ray image series of step 110.

Hence, it is important in step 140 that the patient be positioned with nearly the identical posture during the MRI that indicated abnormal pathology in the motion x-ray frame selected in step 120 as showing the aberrant pathology.

Recent improvement in MRI technology, as disclosed in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,196,519; 6,677,753; and 6,828,792; which are incorporated herein by reference, have enabled commercial equipment for the acquisition of MRI in other than prone position, such as weight bearing position or any positions of a joint over a range of motion. Such equipment is currently available from Fonar Corporation 110 Marcus Drive, Melville, N.Y. 11747

Further, the proper areas of the tissue must be imaged. Because MRI is so precise in its ability to image sections of tissue, care must be taken to select the appropriate series of sections as well as acquire the images under conditions in which the suspected damaged tissue will stand out from adjacent tissue so that the diagnosis can be obtained. That is the radiologist analyzing the MRI images must be able to look at the right location to see the thinning, tears, scar or other damage to the precise soft tissue to diagnose the injury and source of pain. This particularly problematic because such damage may be present in any of the three dimensions the damaged tissues occupies and at any orientation, thus it will be difficult to capture in a 2-dimensional image acquired by MRI. Hence, prior MRI studies of a patient that did not show soft tissue damage can cause false negative results.

Thus, in order to overcome this difficulty it has been discovered that specific imaging conditions will accurately and reproducibly indicate the aforementioned tissue damage. However, these imaging conditions are specific to the pathology identified in the motion x-ray analysis of steps 110 and 120.

Table I discloses preferred combinations of MRI imaging modes and conditions in series of columns for the various cervical spine injuries common in MVA, as listed in the sequence rows.

The important imaging conditions listed in the first row of Table 1 is the patient's position or posture, the MRI slice orientation and the spin sequence and analysis method used by the MRI machine to create the contrast in the image. Generally, in all cases it is desirable to acquire MRI images under the conditions in the second row when the patient is upright, rather than prone or recumbent with the neck in a neutral posture (not bent in any direction) other neck positions are flexing forward or extending backward or titled to the side or with the mouth open. After these neutral posture images are obtained additional images are acquired according to the pathology identified in step 110, where the patient is placed in the same posture that resulted in the finding of abnormal pathology in step 120.

MRI imaging parameters are MRI slice orientation (stack positioning), slice thickness (for optimal ligamentous, joint dysfunction assessment), spin sequence (to view soft tissue with sequences best used to reveal soft tissue pathology) and where to specifically look for the lesion which had been found on the initial Motion X-Ray study of step 110.

The MRI slice orientation and position is either axial (looking down the spine) or sagittal (looking at the spine in profile) as well as centered on a particular bone or junction. Anterior to posterior view (AP) means facing the patient from the front so that the right and left sides are visible.

The images must be acquired in specific planes or slices where the abnormal pathology is likely to be visible based on the initial x-ray study. Generally, it is preferred that multiple slices are obtained; hence there is a need to determine the slice spacing and the number of slices.

It is also generally preferred in the inventive method that an x-ray image that shows the proper posture for the MRI images also be marked with one or more lines that indicate the desired MRI section locations. Such images that contain these marking will be referred to as templates. It is further preferred that the template also include a visual photograph of the patent that is recorded at the same instant the X-ray image was recorded. It is preferred that these images are provided as small inset images of reduced magnification at the corner of template where it will not obscure important anatomical features.

Thus, in another embodiment shown in FIG. 2, an additional step 135 of the preparation of a template guided by motion x-ray findings is to direct MRI image acquisitions. The template may be in an x-ray image that is neutral sagital, flexion, extension and A-P open mouth bending so that the MRI technician can position the patient at the same posture during the MRI acquisition of step 140, as well as acquire the MRI's at the designated slices.

The inventive technique is very effective and reproducible for several reasons. Damage to soft tissue is more likely to be visible under postural loads when the bone movement is abnormal. The abnormality of bone movement will aid in identify the specific soft tissue anatomy that may be damaged. However, the MRI(s) must also be recorded under conditions that are likely to highlight the damage. These conditions will depend on the location of the injury, as the surrounding structure may have inherent low or interfering contrast under some MRI conditions.

Thus, FIG. 9A-13A illustrates such a template wherein the corresponding FIG. 9C-13C are the MRI images of a slices as marked on the template.

Further, imaging parameters also includes a spin sequences, which refers to the precise nature of the magnetic field resonance and decay that is measured. These conditions are well known by the acronyms T1, T2, PDI (proton density image) and the like as indicated in the table. Each Imaging parameter causes different types of cervical or joint tissues to appear lighter or darker in the MRI such that the full detail of the anatomy likely to be involved in each type of pathology in the x-ray sequence can be detected.

The T1 imaging mode reveals bone position and fracture, rim lesion, which is a tearing of a disk from attachment to vertebra body as well as distention of cranial elements through the foramen magnum (opening in skull where spinal cord descends).

In contrast, T2 imaging mode reveal soft tissue, such as ligaments, spinal fluid, nerves, spinal cord, muscle tears, swelling and edema. FSE (fast spin echo) is a subset of the T1 and T2 modes.

Proton density images (PDI) or proton density weighted sequences imaging mode is specifically best suited to reveal ligaments in the cranio-cervical junction ie. (alar, transverse ligament, tectorial membrane, posterior atlanto-occipital membrane and the like). Slice orientation is very import to visualize the alar ligaments consistently. While the gradient echo image (GRE) mode is preferred for acquiring axial (top down) disc images.

Generally, speaking under such appropriate imaging mode/spin conditions normal ligament are typically dark, and expands along their length or breadth at constant and homogenous intensity and thickness. However, if the ligament is damaged, it may appear thin or disappear, if not show an actual tear.

Further, when tissue is damaged it attempts to heal by growing fibrotic cells. However, the fibrotic cells being weaker and not as elastic as the native tissue will in effect be scared, and are frequently visible as lightened area of signal intensity along a dark and continuous ligamentous structure. Sometimes the damaged ligament will thicken where it rubs against a bone due to misalignment from damage to it or another ligament. A few ligaments are particularly prone to such damage not because of initial injury, but because the failure of other ligaments results in their mal-positioning with respect to bone.

Thus the skilled radiologist, surgeon or chiropractor, when presented with the MRI images acquired under conditions in Table I will be utilize their intimate knowledge of normal soft tissue anatomy to recognize the abnormal tissue that is either torn, thinned, scarred or misaligned. It should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to particular spin sequences but may use any current or future MRI imaging modality that may be subsequently discovered.

From such diagnosis of tissue damage by the above method the suitability of various treatment modalities can be evaluated by medical professions, as well as verifying that the patient's complaints of pain are indeed real, as they correlate with nerves that would be affected by the damage. It should be understood that pain can result from either direct damage to soft tissue having sensitive nerve endings (nocioceptors) or because the trauma results in an unstable spine in which bones move and effect various neuro-structure's, nerve roots and spinal cord leading to pain.

FIG. 3 is a sagittal MRI to illustrate the normal healthy anatomy of the cervical spine, which the numbered arrows point to the following soft tissue structure: 1. Normal apical ligament; 2. Anterior occipitoatlantal membrane; 3. Anterior atlantoaxial membrane; 4. Anterior longitudinal ligament; 5. Tectorial membrane; 6. Dural reflection; 7. Posterior occipitoatlantal membrane; 8. Posterior atlantoaxial membrane; 9. Nuchal ligament; 10. Flaval ligaments; 11. Area of interspinous ligaments; 12. Supraspinous ligament.

FIG. 4-13 now illustrates selected combination of the imaging modes according to Table I that reveal's a variety of soft tissue damage in several patients. FIG. 4A is sagital x-ray frame of a first patient facing forward in an upright neutral posture, while FIG. 4B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time x-ray image of FIG. 4A was acquired. FIG. 4C is the MRI in the same posture and orientation as the X-ray in FIG. 4B, however as the spinal cord and ligaments are now visible the multiple herniated discs bulge outward. This is revealed indirectly by their compression of the spinal cord, as the white lines representing the fluid surrounding the cord has thinned as the disc herniations impinge upon it.

FIG. 5A is sagital x-ray frame of another patient facing forward, in an upright neutral posture while FIG. 5B is a photograph of the patients posture at the x-ray frame of FIG. 5A was acquired. FIG. 5C is the MRI in the same posture and orientation as the X-ray in FIG. 4B, however the herniated discs are more severe than as in FIG. 4C, as the fluid surrounding the cord is no longer visible at the disc herniations.

FIG. 6A is a sagital motion X-ray frame in which the patient is in a flexion posture, which FIG. 6B being the visual image of the patient when the frame of FIG. 6A was recorded. The MRI in FIG. 6C was recorded with the T2 FSE spin sequence at the same flexion posture as FIG. 6A and now shows both Anteriolisthesis (forward slipping) of C4-5 as indicated by arrow 601 and a Torn Posterior Longitudinal Ligament at as indicated by arrow 602.

FIG. 7A is a sagital motion X-ray frame in which the patient is in a flexion posture, which FIG. 7B being the visual image of the patient when frame of FIG. 7A was recorded. The MRI in FIG. 7C was recorded with the T2 FSE spin sequence at the same flexion posture as FIG. 7A and now shows both Anteriolisthesis of C4-5 at arrow 701 and disc/spinal cord compression at arrows 702 and 703.

FIG. 8A is a sagital motion X-ray frame in which the patient is in an extension posture showing Retrolisthesis of C3-4 (backward slipping). The MRI image in FIG. 8C was recorded with a T2 FSE spin sequence and also shows Retrolisthesis of C3-4 at arrow 801 as well as disc/spinal cord compression at arrows 802 and 803.

FIG. 9A is a sagital x-ray frame of a patient in an upright neutral posture and is marked as a template with the series of white lines for MRI slices orientation for coronal images of alar and transverse ligaments. FIG. 9B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time x-ray image of FIG. 9A was acquired. FIG. 9C is the PD weighted MRI image from the middle slice in FIG. 9B, with the arrow pointing to the torn alar ligament.

FIG. 10A is a sagital motion x-ray frame with the patient in an upright posture but in right rotation. FIG. 10B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time x-ray image of FIG. 10A was acquired. FIG. 10A is marked as a template with the series of white lines to show the preferred axial slice orientation for acquiring PD weighted MRI image sequences of axial spots at the craniocervical junction for assessment of the transverse/alar ligament damage. FIG. 10C is the PD weighted MRI image for the slice in FIG. 10A connected by the black arrow that points to it. The white arrow in FIG. 10C lines points to the torn transverse ligament that is now revealed.

FIG. 11A is a sagital motion x-ray frame with the patient in an upright neutral posture. FIG. 11B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time x-ray image of FIG. 11A was acquired. FIG. 11A is marked as a template with the series of white lines to show the preferred axial slice orientation for acquiring a series of MRI's using a T2 FSE spin sequence axial spots at the craniocervical junction for assessment of the transverse/alar ligament damage. FIG. 11C is the corresponding MRI acquired with the patient in the same neutral posture as in FIGS. 11A and 11B. The arrow in FIG. 11C points to the torn transverse ligament.

FIG. 12A is a sagital motion x-ray frame with the patient in an upright flexion posture and is marked as a template with a series of black lines indicated the preferred MRI slice orientation for Axial spot of the intervertebral disc. FIG. 12B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time x-ray image of FIG. 12A was acquired, FIG. 12C is the MRI using GRE spin sequence and obtained at the lower slice in FIG. 12A with the arrow pointing to the region of severe disc herniation with spinal cord and nerve root compression.

FIG. 13A is a sagital motion x-ray frame with the patient in an upright extension posture and is marked as a template with a series of black lines indicated the preferred MRI slice orientation for Axial spot of the intervertebral disc. FIG. 13B is a photograph of the patients posture at the time the x-ray image of FIG. 13A was acquired. FIG. 13C is the MRI of the lower slice in FIG. 13B acquired with a GRE spin sequence wherein the arrow points to a region of severe disc herniation with spinal cord and nerve root compression.

It should be understood that although the examples provided apply to the cervical spine the various embodiments of the inventive method are applicable to other joints, elbow, knee and like joints with suspected segmental dysfunction.

In another embodiment of the invention it is desirable to record absolute posture in the x-ray motion sequence for optimal or exact patient positioning for the subsequent MRI steps to optimize images of pathoanatomy.

Such methods of reproducing the patient posture in the MRI stage include having the MRI technician or radiologist review the template X-ray images and position the patient as close as possible by visual references. The visual reference can be to the anatomy of the x-ray, but is preferably to a photographic visual light image of the patient recorded simultaneously with the x-ray frame, and generally presented as a smaller magnification image in the corner of the frame. Once the first MRI is acquired at a slice orientation equivalent to the plane of the x-ray image the position of the patient can be adjusted slightly by eye. It is especially preferred that the x-ray and MRI images can be overlaid or fused to assist in making such a visual comparison.

Alternatively, the software described below for image analysis is software may be operative to direct the computer to compare the x-ray and first MRI to determine a goodness of fit of the hard bony anatomy that is visible in both. Once the goodness of fit meets a predetermined level, further MRI imaging can be obtained while the patient maintains the same posture or joint position. Alternatively, when patient is found to have pathology/segmental dysfunction in flexion motion x-ray, a simple goniometer to measure degree of flexion, can assist the MRI technician to reproduce similar posture in MRI.

Additional embodiment of the invention include the partial or full automation of the process sequences using image recognition software that is capable of performing may if not all of the steps described above.

In another embodiment of the invention the analysis is computer aided. The software will encompass using digitized grayscale recognition to automatically access extreme misalignments, capture those images to use to direct proper patient positioning and proper guidance for Dynamic Upright MRI imaging parameters. In other embodiments of the invention software will direct a general purpose computer or a digital signal processor or the like to use digital mensuration in reviewing the motion x-ray sequences to identify the exact images that have met threshold for clinical instability. In general, the software preferably enables the automatic detection, when bony structures have breached a normal positional threshold.

Software method 600 as shown in FIG. 14 in a first step 610, is the acquiring of a sequential plurality of digital x-ray images frames of the joint undergoing motion.

In step 620, each image frame from step 610 is analyzed to identity at least one of perimeter and corners of each bony structure. Software to perform such analysis on grey scale x-ray images is commercially available.

Further, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,974,165; 7,295,691; all of which are incorporated herein by references, provides further details on methods of detecting bony and other structures in grey scale images by computer means to provide a digital representation for further image processing and analysis described below.

Further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,099,859, which is incorporated herein by references, teaches means for x-ray image acquisition of joints and computer aided characterization of joint abnormalities.

Further, other embodiment of the invention also contemplates alternate means of acquiring a digital representation of joints, and in particular the spine, such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,907, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Further, it is preferable that the anatomical identify of each bony structure identified and mapped in step 620 be determined. This determination can be manual, by presenting a subset of the images to a radiologist and request a name of other identify be provided for each discrete bony structure identified in the process. For example, the software can present the radiologist with a grey scale image onto which is overlaid colored outlines or markers of the digital representation of each bony structure determined in step 620, prompt for the entry of a name for each structure as it is presented. Alternatively, the determination can be automated wherein the software is operative to make additional calculation to determine a bone identify figure of merit by comparing the digital representation using at least one of formulas and properties in a reference table, and then identify the bone in the table when the calculation yield the highest figure of merit. Such criteria for calculating a figure of merit in the reference table may include, without limitation bone area, proximity of other structures, aspect ratio and the like.

Next in step 630, for each bone structure in each image a bone placement figure of merit (FOM) is calculated to determine if the bony structures have breached a normal positional threshold. Such a threshold calculation may include one or more calculations based on one or a matrix of multiple parameters that may include rotation, displacement and spacing either absolute or with respect to adjacent bones. The bone displacement figure of merit may also take into account widely available diagnostic criteria for any condition. It would also incorporate the AMA Guides for impairment 5^(th) edition which define clinical instability. Thus, the higher the figure of merit, the more a bone is displaced from its normal position.

After the calculations in step 630, it then possible to calculate, in step 640, at least one image pathology FOM from the bone displacement FOM for each bone in the image for which the FOM is being calculated. The image pathology FOM may be the raw sum of the bone placement FOM, or a weighted calculation thereof, and optional may only take into account bone displacements that have breached a normal positional threshold.

Using the calculation of steps 630 and 640, it is then possible to determine which x-ray frame show an abnormal pathology and thus direct the further steps of MRI acquisition. Further, to the extent the FOM calculated uses a medical diagnostic criteria, it is possible to also determine the named condition for the abnormal pathology for the direction of MRI acquisition.

Ideally, in step 650 after an image pathology FOM is calculated for each x-ray frame the frames showing the most abnormal pathology, via high image pathology FOM, are selected. Optionally, the radiologist can view these frames in a manner that simultaneously displays the digital representation of the bone to confirm the accuracy thereof, as well as to select patient postures for MRI imaging. To the extent that the software has misidentified or mischaracterized a bone position this can be rectified manually by the radiologist by outline the correction bone position, such as through a pen entry screen, a curser or pointing device and the like, the above FOM calculation re-performed. To the extent that the image pathology FOM has provided a diagnosis for the x-ray frames displace, the radiologist can confirm, update or revise this result as appropriate for further MRI acquisition.

In step 660, the MRI parameters are determined for each patient posture that the radiologist desires to investigate further, or alternatively the MRI parameters can be determined independent of intervention using the postures that results in image frame with the highest image pathology FOM. In this step the pathological diagnosis for the image frame is compared with that in column 1 of Table 1, or a similar table for other disorders to select the MRI parameters in the corresponding row.

In step 670, optionally a template is generated to image the regions surrounding each bone with a high FOM in the selected image frame with an abnormal pathology FOM.

The result of step 670 can be either an image, such as FIG. 9A-13A, with multiple lines shown for MRI slice orientation, or a digital instruction set for MRI acquisition with the MRI parameters being generated based on the corresponding row in Table 1, as well as from the anatomical features that are identified in digital format from step 620.

It should be appreciated that optionally step 600 may includes goniometric measurement of head or neck absolute position in each x-ray frame. This goniometric position of the patients posture is intended to be highly reproducible when positioning the patient for the MRI, and would thus also be includes in MRI instruction set that results from step 670.

Thus, in step 680 the MRI's are acquired per the MRI template of Step 670, with the patient in the posture determined by the frames selected in step 650.

The above process preferably creates or deploys the following data files or data structure of which the content is described below:

For each frame in the series of dynamic x-rays images there is a digital version that is a Bit map or vector representation of image, that is photon intensity versus position, as well as a frame reference indicator so the frame can be indexed with respect to adjacent images in the sequence. Further, U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,06, which is incorporated herein by reference, teaches additional means of automated image feature extraction and digitally representing cartilage structure in MRI images for the purposes of accessing the disease state, which are generally applicable to bone structures as well as further steps of quantifying the damage to soft tissue that is ultimately imaged by MRI in step 680.

Within or associated with each referenced frame is a data record of the identity of each bone structure detected by the image analysis process as well as a geometric representation of the bone as a series of at least 3 coordinate points or vectors, which may represent corners or the perimeter.

Further associated with each bone in each image are bone pathology FOM, and optionally an identity for each bone, such a name, number or combination thereof.

Further associated with each image frame is an image pathology FOM, an optional image pathology diagnosis.

It should be understood that the digital reference to an image frame does not preclude various data compression formats, such as JPEG, MPEG and the like, not does the reference to the calculation of image pathology with respect to each x-ray frame mean that absolutely each frame is analyzed, as it is expected to eliminate frame's that show little change or down select a smaller number of representative x-ray frames by pre-processing and other means to lessen the calculation burden.

To the extent that the MRI parameters are not determined manually after step 650, it is further desirable that the data file or record of image frame selected for obtaining a corresponding MRI also have associated therewith the MRI acquisitions parameters, such as slice orientation, spin sequence parameters and the like as described above. Further, to the extent that it is desirable to obtain multiple MRI at different postures, it is also desirable that the master patient data file contain or associate these and other parameters to each x-ray frame of interest, meaning it has an identified pathology or serves as a normal state references subject to further MRI acquisitions.

Optionally, the data set for each image frame of interest also include a posture coordinate set which contains the goniometric measurement of one or more external positions of a characteristic external anatomy that when reproduced in the MRI chamber uniquely position the patient in the same posture as the X-ray acquisition step. Of course it should be appreciated that another aspect of the invention is an imaging device or machine that acquires both the x-ray and MRI images while the patient is seated or otherwise disposed in the same chamber of the device so as to minimize the posture reproducibility error. Such a generic MRI machine 1500 is schematically illustrated in a plan section in FIG. 15A, the patient 10, or a portion thereof is situated in zone or cavity 1501 to be exposed to a magnetic field 1502 from the MRI magnet source 1505. Pick up coils are omitted from the figures for simplicity of illustration, as are other components well understood to one of ordinary skill in MRI technology. The MRI instrument 1500 having a cavity 1501 for receiving a patient 10 that is open on two or more opposing sides, an x-ray source 1510 is disposed to irradiate a patent in the cavity 1501 of the MRI from a first of the two or more open sides such that the spatial attention of x-rays by area x-ray detector 1515, disposed on a side opposite said x-ray source 1510 can continuously acquire a plurality of x-ray images of the patient during the initial phase of their movement as described above. Preferably a digital camera 1520 simultaneously acquires visual images of the patient to aid in posture reproduction as described further below.

MRI machine 1500 also includes a control unit, power and image processing unit 1530 connected in power and/or signal communication with each of the MRI magnet source 1505, x-ray source 1510, x-ray detector 1515 and preferably also the optional digital camera 1520.

However, since the x-ray image are acquired dynamically while the patient move the limb or joint, there will still be a need reproduce a particular position that corresponds to a posture that was held for a mere instant during the course of the x-ray acquisition process.

FIG. 15B illustrates a configuration for tracking posture of a patient 10, by placing marking 1541 and 1542 on select portion of the head, face or neck. The marking can be imaged with the digital camera in synchronization with the dynamic x-ray frame acquisition, hence then by associating each x-ray frame with image coordinates for the marking 1541, 1442 and the like, the same posture can be verified by using the digital camera and image analysis software to confirm the markings have the same image coordinates.

In additional, for calculating bone pathology, bone identity and image pathology FOM's it is desirable to utilize additional data files so that comparison can be made to a normal or nominal pathology and the FOM calculated. Further to the extent that certain MRI imaging be conducted automatically, it is also desirable that process 600 also identify reference topography were desired to define the slice orientation precisely, based on the first or any earlier acquired MRI after the patient is placed in the designated posture.

In addition, there is a data file representing the information in Table I and the like, so that the proper MRI conditions are selected based on the abnormal pathology found in the particular image frames by the process 600. Data file for image pathology FOM calculation and comparison for each bone in each image pathology that requires a particular set of MRI imaging parameters

While the invention has been described in connection with a preferred embodiment, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular form set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

TABLE 1 MRI MRI Imaging parameters Image Patient plane or position(s) or Slice Imaging slice posture Slice orientation(s) thickness parameters Neutral If patient is Sagital Neutral Parallel to the cervical   3 mm T1, T2 Sagital found to spine, with stack FSE. When Motion X- have a loss of oriented thru the center necessary Ray clip the cervical and sides of the dens of Proton Findings lordosis, C2 Density straightening, weighted curve image if reversal, suspected buckling, ligamentous signs of damage. angulation or listhesis. Note: Axial Neutral Slice orientation   3 mm GRE structures parallel to the that are endplates with stack found and starting above, going can be thru and below the evaluated: endplates Ligaments found to stretch or fail are the anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, Facet capsular ligament, Interspinous ligament, supra spinous ligament, Nuchal ligament, alar ligament, transverse ligament, apical ligament, tectorial membrane, posterior atlanto occipital membrane, posterior atlanto axial membrane Neutral Disc Space Axial Neutral If angulation is present,   3 mm GRE Sagital angulation slice thru the center of the disc. Split the difference of the angulation of upper and lower vertebral endplate's for slice orientation A-P open Suspected Coronal at Neutral Slice orientation 2.8 mm Proton mouth alar, the approximately 10-15 Density Motion X-ray accessory or craniocervical degrees posterior to the weighted Clips transverse junction superior/posterior sequence ligament position of the tip of failure the dens of C2 A-P open Suspected Axial spot Neutral Slice orientation 2.8 mm Proton mouth alar, or somewhat Density Motion X-ray transverse perpendicular to the tip weighted Clips ligament of the dens of C2, sequence failure starting above the foramen magnum to the middle of the body of C2 1. Flexion Listhesis or Sagital Flexion Slice orientation(s)   3 mm sagital interspinous Flexion Parallel to the cervical motion fanning, spine, with stack X- angulation oriented thru the center ray consistant and sides of the dens of clips with failure C2 of the PLL, Ligamentum flavum, facet joint capsule, interspinous ligament and nuchal or supraspinous ligament Flexion Sagital Flexion axial spot Slice orientation Sagital Flexion when disc parallel to the motion pathology found endplates with stack X-ray such as starting above, going clip angulation, thru and below the protrusion/herniation endplates Sagital Sagital Extension axial Slice orientation Extension Extension spot when disc parallel to the motion X-ray pathology found endplates with stack clip such as starting above, going angulation, thru and below the protrusion/herniation endplates Sagital Sagital Extension Parallel to the cervical Extension Extension spine, with stack motion X-ray oriented thru the center clip and sides of the dens of C2 

1. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures, the method comprising the steps of: a. acquiring a dynamic sequence of x-ray images of at least one joint of a living creature over a range of motion, b. analyzing the dynamic x-ray image frames to identify positions and locations with possible abnormal pathology, c. determining MRI parameters for imaging the possible abnormal pathology in greater detail than the x-ray images, d. acquiring MRI images at positions and locations with abnormal pathology with said parameters.
 2. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures according to claim 1 wherein at least one joint is the human cervical spine and the living creature is a human being disposed in an upright posture.
 3. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures according to claim 2 wherein the range of motion comprises at least one of flexion, extension and rotation of the head and neck.
 4. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures according to claim 3 wherein the MRI parameters for acquiring the MRI images includes the stage of flexion, extension and rotation of the head and neck that revealed the abnormal pathology in the dynamic x-ray image frames.
 5. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures according to claim 4 further comprising the step of marking one of more dynamic x-ray image frames are with multiple lines to provides a series of slice orientations for the MRI parameters.
 6. A medical imaging method for joints in living creatures according to claim 1 wherein said step of analyzing the dynamic x-ray image frames further comprises computing means to identify positions and locations with possible abnormal pathology.
 7. A medical imaging device comprising, a. an MRI instrument having a cavity for receiving a patient that is open on two or more opposing sides, b. an x-ray source disposed to irradiate a patent in the cavity of the MRI from a first of the two or more open sides, c. an x-ray detector disposed on a side opposite said x-ray source for continuously acquiring a plurality of x-ray images of the patient.
 8. A medical imaging device according to claim 7 further comprising a patient support surface wherein the patient is in an upright position in the MRI cavity.
 9. A medical imaging device according to claim 7 wherein the x-ray detector is operative to continuously acquire digital X-ray images as discrete image frames for further analysis to determine MRI imaging parameters.
 10. A medical imaging device according to claim 9 further comprising computing means to analyze each digital x-ray image frame for determining MRI imaging parameters.
 11. A medical imaging device according to claim 10 wherein the computing means is further operative to compare the posture of a patient in one or more x-ray image frames to at least one MRI image to confirm substantially the same posture of the patient before acquiring multiple MRI images in that posture.
 12. A medical imaging device according to claim 10 wherein the computing means is operative associate a posture coordinate set for one or more X-ray image frames of interest to confirm substantially the same posture of the patient before acquiring multiple MRI images in that posture.
 13. A medical imaging device according to claim 12 wherein the posture coordinate set contains the goniometric measurement of one or more external positions of a characteristic external anatomy that is uniquely reproducible to position the patient in the same posture for the acquisition of multiple MRI images in that posture.
 14. A medical imaging device according to claim 12 further comprising a digital camera to simultaneously acquire image frames in synchronization with x-ray image frame wherein the posture coordinate set is determined from visual markers placed on the patient being examined to reproducibly position the patient in the same posture for the acquisition of multiple MRI images in that posture.
 15. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software that is operative to direct a general purpose computer to carry out the steps of: a. analyzing a sequence of digital x-ray image of a joint of a living creature in motion to: i. identify the boney structures in each image, ii. compare the relative positions of the bony structure with respect to each other against a reference table to develop a first figure of merit representing abnormality for each boney structure in each image frame, iii. Develop of second figure of merit for the abnormal pathology of each image frame from the cumulative values of the first figure of merit associated with each boney structure in the image frame, b. selecting at least one image frame based on the second figure of merit for acquiring one of more MRI images wherein the joint is in the same posture, c. determining the MRI parameters for imaging the possible abnormal pathology in greater detail than the x-ray images.
 16. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to claim 15 that is further operative to mark one of more dynamic x-ray image frames with multiple lines to provide a series of slice orientations for the MRI imaging parameters.
 17. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to claim 15 that is further operative direct an MRI machine to automating acquire images at the MRI parameters.
 18. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to claim 15 that is further operative to confirm the joint is in the same posture during a subsequent step of MRI imaging in at least one of the same or a different MRI machine.
 19. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to 15 that is further operative to identify reference topography in MRI images thus acquired to define the slice orientation for additional MRI images to be subsequently acquired.
 20. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to claim 18 wherein the at least one joint is the human cervical spine and the living creature is a human being disposed in an upright posture.
 21. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon software according to claim 19 wherein the range of motion comprises at least one of flexion, extension and rotation of the head and neck.
 22. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a data structure comprising: a. a first field containing data representing the identity or sequence of an x-ray image frame from a series of dynamic x-ray images of a living creatures showing at least one joint in motion, b. a second data field containing at least one of bimap or vector representation of x-ray intensity in the image frame corresponding to spatial coordinate positions for each x-ray image frame identified in the first data field c. a third data field containing the identity of each bone structure detected by an image analysis process for each image in the second data field, d. a fourth data field containing a bone pathology FOM for each bone in the third data field. 